Which type of interview is typically favored by courts for its reliability?

Structured interviews are favored by courts for their reliability because they follow a predetermined format with standardized questions. This consistency allows for a uniform approach in how information is gathered from each participant, minimizing variability that could arise from interviewer bias or differing question phrasing. The structured nature of the interview helps ensure that all relevant topics are covered comprehensively, making it easier to compare responses across different subjects. This can be particularly critical in legal settings where objective assessment and evidentiary standards are paramount. The clarity and repeatability that structured interviews offer also enhance their value in a court setting, where the integrity of information is essential.