In what level of morality might a person's internal values conflict with societal values?

The correct answer is postconventional morality because this level of moral reasoning is characterized by individuals who have developed their own ethical principles that may conflict with societal norms or laws. Those operating at this level prioritize their personal integrity and moral conscience over the opinions of the society around them. They understand that while laws and rules are important, they are not absolute and can be questioned or re-evaluated based on higher ethical principles.

At the postconventional stage, individuals may adhere to universal ethical principles such as justice, fairness, and equality, which can lead to moral decisions that differ from what the larger society accepts at that time. This indicates a level of moral reasoning that is more autonomous and reflective, allowing for criticism of societal values when they are perceived as unjust.

In contrast, conventional morality is characterized by adherence to societal norms and expectations without questioning them. Preconventional morality is focused on obedience and self-interest, where moral reasoning is driven by the consequences for oneself rather than broader ethical principles. Social conformity often relates to the desire to fit in or align with group norms, which does not involve the critical reflection typical of postconventional reasoning. Therefore, postconventional morality stands out as the level where personal values can conflict with societal values.